Jump to content

Zgreens

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Zgreens's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. Yeah, me too, but some of us don't have the luxury of unlimited solo gaming time. I understand that the majority of play hours will be solo, and I understand why, but that's not my use case.
  2. Yes, because my only gaming time is a set weekly multiplayer with two friends.
  3. OK, So maybe I'm the only one, and if I am, I will shut up. For reasons that don't bear going into, I am only able to play video games once a week, for about a 2.5 hour window. (I know, we all got problems, and this is one of mine.) The facts: 1. I've been excited about JA3 from the moment it got released, talking it up to peers. 2. The features section of every piece of JA3 marketing has said "Experience the campaign with friends in online co-op mode" 3. Announcement today: Co-op is 2 player only 4. Other games word their co-op statements thusly: Portal 2: "Complete two-person co-op" It Takes Two: "Embark on a crazy journey, purely build for two..." We Were Here: "Two players are trapped inside an abandoned castle, with Player One confined to a small secluded part of the castle as Player Two roams the halls trying to find Player One." Baldur's Gate 3: "Play alone, and select your companions carefully, or as a party of up to four in multiplayer." I could continue, but I won't. The only example I found that just says "friends" is "Sons of the Forest". The wiki says it supports 8 players. This may sound needlessly nit picky, but this detail is the difference between me being able to play this game for 300 hours, or maybe like 3. Am I the only one who feels that this was a deliberate "whoopsie" to boost pre-orders?
×
×
  • Create New...