ShadowMagic Posted June 8, 2023 Author Share Posted June 8, 2023 22 hours ago, Povok said: If you want to keep Magic with a hat, this is something more like him: Aware, focused, in control, lethal. That's better.. But I was more thinking about: 1: Laurence Fishburne (pretty damn sure they used his portrait as a reference in early JA 😄 ) 2: Samuel L. Jackson. Imagine these portraits with the original voice acting and you got a 100% match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claypl Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 I'm for Laurence Fishburne alike. Other two would require to reduce Agility stat 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GODSPEED Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 6 hours ago, Hendrix said: Hmmm... From the viewpoint that this is a Jagged Alliance game 5/10. The style is simply too much "happy-go-lucky" and I didn't even count the fact they turned Grizzly into Hurk. From my own perspective, I've been doing everything to AVOID learning more about the game, because when I play it. I want to be as free from bias as I possibly can. It's really hard to get my mind wrapped around the style they chose in comparison with the more "serious" tone of the oldies. Also, as you mentioned, quite a few choices that we're made still puzzle me. To me, the areas that I agree with a 5/10 would be concerning things like inventory, colour palette, "crafting".. those - to me - already feel like a little bit of a downer. On the other hand, if they can make questing, maps and gameworld interesting and feel lived-in, the score can easily be elevated to a 7. While the plan to add modding down the line is cool.. I mean, that can go ANY way. Will the game be good enough that we will get more in-depth inventory/gear like backpacks, pouches, modular equipment? Only time will tell, so I cannot really count modding as something that I can help to rate the game. Back in Action had a few "mods", but they lacked depth, so didn't really help that game all that much. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alras Posted June 8, 2023 Share Posted June 8, 2023 12 hours ago, Hendrix said: Hmmm... From the 12'ish hours of gameplay I have seen, I would rate this game in 2 different ways. From the viewpoint that this is a tactical turnbased game, I would say 7/10, could be a 8/10 with expanded features. From the viewpoint that this is a Jagged Alliance game 5/10. The style is simply too much "happy-go-lucky" and I didn't even count the fact they turned Grizzly into Hurk. Agree! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now